I just read the article titled, "Marry Him!" by Lori Gottlieb in the Atlantic Monthly.
Here's an excerpt from her article advising 30- and 40-something single women to caste their sites lower when picking a mate: "My advice is this: Settle! That’s right. Don’t worry about passion or
intense connection. Don’t nix a guy based on his annoying habit of
yelling “Bravo!” in movie theaters. Overlook his halitosis or abysmal
sense of aesthetics. Because if you want to have the infrastructure in
place to have a family, settling is the way to go." She went on to say , "...every woman I know—no matter how successful and ambitious, how
financially and emotionally secure—feels panic, occasionally coupled
with desperation, if she hits 30 and finds herself unmarried... if you say you’re not worried, either you’re in denial or you’re lying."
Gottlieb is a single mother who did not settle. When "Mr. Right" did not appear she chose to have a child using a sperm donor. Now faced with being a 40 year old single mother, with no husband prospects, she wished she would have married "Mr. Good Enough" when she had a chance.
Her advice infuriated other female writers. Sarah Hepola in Salon.com, said "... it frankly pisses me off when a stranger tells me I'm in denial
about the shame of being single. And telling me not to demand passion
or intense connection? Sorry. I won't settle for that."
Megan Daum in the Los Angeles Times said, "... baby hunger has become such a consumer force in this country that some
(not all, but some) women want a baby in the same way they want a Louis
Vuitton bag, because they've been told to want one." And concluded with, "I can't help but wonder if what's missing from the prototypical unhappy
single woman's life isn't a man or a baby but an imagination. There are
infinite ways to define a fulfilling life."
Lesley M.M. Blume in the Huffingtonpost.com Gottlieb offered, " Gottlieb does not need a husband. She needs hired help."
Some of Gottlieb's quips are a bit harsh, such as her observation that "Marriage isn’t a passion-fest; it’s more like a partnership formed to
run a very small, mundane, and often boring nonprofit business." She states that she, "...means this in a good way." But the article doesn't exactly have a positive tone.
It is understandable that there are strong reactions to her beliefs. I think a possibly more productive discussion would be to ask how can both men and women have a more realistic expectation of marriage, rather than either party feeling like they are "settling." Divorce rates are high and the emotional residue is great for both adults and children. "Settling" doesn't seem like a great way to ensure marital success.
There are stressors in any of the scenarios Gottlieb covered. Women that are "stay at home" moms run the risk of being financially dependent on their spouse. Husbands are not a secure financial plan; death, divorce, or disability, make women vulnerable. Parents that are married with children and both working outside the home have pressures inherent with holding down two full time jobs; home and work. Single mothers either by choice, or by circumstances have their own set of challenges.
No one is immune from difficulties. People make choices and those choices have pros and cons and consequences. What point that I'd like Gottlieb to make and maybe it is her underlying theme and I missed it, is that most of us (men and women) are relational beings. People may require different levels of intimacy. But it would be nice ,if those who want a relationship, no matter how unorthodox, didn't have to apologize for it.