There is much debate in California about high school exit exams. This article, that appeared in the SF Chronicle, reported that the pass rate was lower this year than last year.
Many argue that standardized tests don't reflect the student's accurate understanding of a subject, but only reflect the ability or inability to pass a test. Others blame the problem of undereducated students on teacher's inability to teach or, on the State of California's poor standards, approach to education and curriculum.
What I found most interesting about this article were the comments that followed it. Most comments reflected issues around English as a Second Language Learners. However, the article clearly stated that the reason it was believed that test scores were down this year was because "special- education" students test results were included in the scoring.
While it is possible that a Special Education student may be bi-lingual, it is not a qualifying criteria for special education. Students that qualify under that category have special learning needs.For example, they may have problems with processing information, or reading difficulties such as poor comprehension.
It is important that no matter what are beliefs are about the state of education that we clearly read and comprehend the issues our children face in order to be good advocates for change.
For more information on Special Education.